Thanks for your response. The “semi-objective” title correctly reflects that the analysis is neither wholly objective (e.g., judging audience reaction) nor wholly subjective (e.g., instead of my judging audience reaction by myself, my spouse and I — who differed in our reactions to the speech — rated them, and we did it by both judging and debating the intensity of the crowd’s reaction). It’s somewhere in-between, i.e. semi-objective. If you were less biased against Wolf’s message, you might be more appreciative of the accuracy of the title. I was attempting to be honest, and not clickbait-y, with the title — that’s it. This is also likely to be the only essay about Wolf’s essay not written by a true-believer conservative that actually agrees with President Trump on one specific point… did you read that far down?

Written by

A geography professor and meteorologist at UGA in Athens, GA. I write about news, sports, weather, climate, education, journalism, religion, poetry, the South.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store